opening page ornament

The Australian Centre for Student Equity and Success acknowledges Indigenous peoples across Australia as the Traditional Owners of the lands on which the nation’s campuses are situated. With a history spanning more than 60,000 years as the original educators, Indigenous peoples hold a unique place in our nation. We recognise the importance of their knowledge and culture, and reflect the principles of participation, equity, and cultural respect in our work. We pay our respects to Elders past, present, and future, and consider it an honour to learn from our Indigenous colleagues, partners, and friends.

You are reading: Student Equity Data Guide: Selecting and Using Equity Reference Values

What is an Equity Reference Value?

An Equity Reference Value is a benchmark used to evaluate the level of equity within higher education institutions. These values help place the shares or rates of equity students in the proper context, allowing for meaningful comparisons. For example, the participation rate of a particular equity group can be compared to their population share to see whether they are under-represented in higher education. Similarly, completion rates for equity students can be compared to the rate of non-equity students to assess if equity students are completing degrees at a comparable level to their peers.

How do I choose an Equity Reference Value?

A good Equity Reference Value should:

  • be measured in a similar way to the higher education equity share or rate
  • provide relevant and appropriate context for the specific equity measure being assessed
  • be regularly reviewed and updated to ensure accuracy and relevance.

The choice of an Equity Reference Value depends on the comparison you want to make:

  • For share-based equity measures[1] (e.g., access, participation, attainment), a population proportion or share is typically used as the reference.
  • For rate-based equity measures (e.g., retention, success, 6- or 9-year completion rates), the rates of non-equity students are commonly used as a reference, or all students if nonequity rates are unavailable.

For area-based equity groups, such as students from regional, remote, or low socio-economic status (SES) areas, state or territory-specific reference values are recommended, as there is significant variation in these population shares across different regions.

What if there is no suitable Equity Reference Value?

If a suitable Equity Reference Value is not available, institutions can still assess equity performance by using alternative methods:

  • Comparing current shares or rates with data from previous years.
  • Benchmarking against similar institutions.
  • Using the best available reference value, even if it’s not a perfect match.

Which Equity Reference Values does the Department of Education use?

The Australian Government Department of Education provides Equity Reference Values in its annual Equity Performance Data release for participation, retention, and success measures. The table below summarises the reference values used for each equity measure and equity group (click on table to open to full screen view).

A table summarising the reference values used for each equity measure and equity group

Now I have an Equity Reference Value, what do I do with it?

Once you have your Equity Reference Value, the next step is to compare it to your equity share or rate. This is typically done by calculating a ratio, which helps assess how your institution’s equity performance measures up against the benchmark.

How to calculate the ratio:

  • Divide your specific equity share or rate by the Equity Reference Value.
  • Ratio = (Equity Share or Rate) / (Equity Reference Value)
  • This calculation provides a ratio that indicates the relationship between the observed
    equity measure and the benchmark.

How to interpret the ratio:

  • Ratio > 1: Your institution’s equity measure is higher than the reference value, reflecting positive performance relative to the benchmark.
  • Ratio < 1: Your institution’s equity measure is lower than the reference value, signaling potential under-performance that may need attention and improvement.

A worked example – calculating participation ratios

Let’s consider the participation share of First Nations Australians in five universities within a state, as shown in Figure 1. Over time, the share of First Nations Australians enrolled at these universities is increasing.

Figure 1: Participation shares of First Nations Australians for five universities

Linegraph showing participation shares of First Nations Australians for five undisclosed universities over time.

Next, we can also plot the Equity Reference Value, representing the state population share of First Nations Australians. As can be seen in Figure 2, this population share is also increasing over time.

Figure 2: Participation shares of First Nations Australians for five universities and the corresponding Equity Reference Value (shown with a dashed line)

Linegraph showing participation shares of First Nation Australians for five undisclosed universities and the corresponding Equity Reference Value

We can then calculate the participation ratio by dividing the share by the Equity Reference Value for each year. These ratios are shown in Figure 3. In most universities, the participation ratio has remained steady because the participation and population shares have increased at a similar rate. However, the ratio remains below 1, indicating that First Nations Australians are still under-represented at these universities.

Figure 3: Participation ratios for First Nations Australians for five universities

Linegraph showing the participation ratios for First Nations Australians for five undisclosed universities


[1] Please see “Student Equity Data Guide: Equity Performance Measures” for explanations of these measures.

[2] Please see “Student Equity Data Guide: Defining Equity Groups” for how these equity groups are defined.

[3] https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/disability/disability-ageing-and-carers-australia-summary-findings/latest-release

Featured publications
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3 (CIF 3) focuses on evaluative studies which provide details of the impacts of specific interventions on equity groups in relation to access to and success in higher education.
This report outlines policy options in relation to parity targets for four priority equity groups in Australian higher education – students from low SES backgrounds, First Nations Australian students, students with disability, and students from regional and remote Australia.
This study addressed this topic in the Australian context using data from the annual Student Experience Survey (2016–2020 waves) with linkage to administrative records for 24,292 students from seven higher education institutions.
A case study documenting the transition of one Indigenous student, Robbie, from an underprivileged school located in the Western suburbs of Sydney to an urban Australian university.
More publications