opening page ornament

Welcome to the Australian Centre for Student Equity and Success

The Australian Centre for Student Equity and Success acknowledges Indigenous peoples across Australia as the Traditional Owners of the lands on which the nation’s campuses are situated. With a history spanning more than 60,000 years as the original educators, Indigenous peoples hold a unique place in our nation. We recognise the importance of their knowledge and culture, and reflect the principles of participation, equity, and cultural respect in our work. We pay our respects to Elders past, present, and future, and consider it an honour to learn from our Indigenous colleagues, partners, and friends.

Enter website
Back to Publications
You are reading: Evidence-based pedagogies to support online engagement of low SES, and regional, rural, and remote students

This is the final report submitted for the ACSES Small Grants Research Program project “Evidence-based pedagogies to support online engagement of low SES, and regional, rural, and remote students”.

Lead researcher: Frances Fan, University of Tasmania

Co-authors: David Hicks and Sarah Fischer, University of Tasmania

Read below for the key points of the report “at a glance”. The full report is available for download in PDF [2 MB] or Word [2 MB] format.

At a glance

Background

Online learning has increased significantly. Online learning may be able to reduce or mitigate barriers to higher education that students from low socio-economic status (SES) and/or regional, rural, and remote (RRR) backgrounds might experience. Unfortunately, course completion rates in higher education are significantly lower for students studying online, with a disproportionate impact on students from disadvantaged backgrounds. This project aimed to address this issue.

What we did

Using data from the University of Tasmania, we described online engagement patterns of low SES and RRR students and identified online pedagogical practices that maximise the engagement of these students, so as to develop a holistic model of online engagement. We did this first by collecting quantitative data, including learning management system data and survey responses, from 119 low SES and RRR students in a suite of 16 online and blended subjects. We then collected qualitative interview data from teachers, students, and support staff to examine teachers’ pedagogical approaches that helped foster the engagement of students in the target priority groups.

What we found

Low SES and RRR students can have multiple associated challenges, but with the right pedagogical support, these students can achieve outcomes as positive as their online peers. Creating a sense of belonging and of (virtual) place can support these students’ social integration into university life.

Online pedagogical designs differed significantly between disciplines and individual subjects. Students sought consistency in how to navigate learning management systems (LMS) in multiple subjects and emphasised the importance of aesthetics and visual design. Subjects based on Universal Design of Learning principles were well received by low SES students and RRR students.

Overall, low SES and RRR students thrive in online learning when they are provided with pedagogical support that recognises their needs and is embedded in a whole of institution support system.

What we recommend

As access expands and student cohorts become more diverse, institutions should align support and resources to match the needs of the cohort and staff supporting them.

Universities should prioritise improving online pedagogies and fostering interactive and socially engaging virtual environments.

Institutions should interpret their LMS data considering the academic context and being aware of the varied quality and reliability of the data available. They should explore ways to understand and track students’ social presence and engagement in online learning.

We provide a toolkit (see Table 6 in Section 7.2) with a range of online pedagogical tools and strategies that can foster social and cognitive engagement. Teachers in online and blended subjects should select the tools suitable for their learner cohorts.

 

The full report is available for download in PDF [2 MB] or Word [2 MB] format.

Download the full report:
ACSES Quote icon
Fan-et-al-2026-Evidence-based-pedagogies-to-support-online-engagement-.pdf
2 MB
ACSES Quote icon
Fan-et-al-2026-Evidence-based-pedagogies-to-support-online-engagement-.docx
2 MB
Low SES Low socioeconomic status Online students Regional, rural and remote Regional and remote Research Reports
Download the full report
Evidence-based pedagogies to support online engagement of low SES, and regional, rural, and remote students
Fan et al., 2026
Featured publications
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3: Programs and approaches that enable equity in higher education
Anna Bennett, Ryan Naylor, Jo Hanley, Jo Lewis, Cheryl Burgess​ , 2024
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3 (CIF 3) focuses on evaluative studies which provide details of the impacts of specific interventions on equity groups in relation to access to and success in higher education.
General
Indigenous
Addressing placement inequities via participatory action research
A Bell​ , 2025
An ACSES Equity Fellowship final report. This project tackled placement poverty and exclusion faced by university students, especially those from equity-deserving groups, by co-developing 40 practical solutions with students and educators.
Research report
Publications
Centring equity in data and digital governance: Informing policy to empower practice
B Stephenson​ , 2026
An ACSES Equity Fellowship final report. The project looks at how Australian universities are managing challenges around the governance of equity data, which tracks how students from underrepresented backgrounds enrol, study, and succeed in higher education.
General / all students
Research Reports
Student’s reported satisfaction at University: the role of personal characteristics and secondary school background
Ian W. Li, Denise Jackson, Paul Koshy ​ , 2024
This study addressed this topic in the Australian context using data from the annual Student Experience Survey (2016–2020 waves) with linkage to administrative records for 24,292 students from seven higher education institutions.
Equity Practitioners
Featured
More publications
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3: Programs and approaches that enable equity in higher education
Anna Bennett, Ryan Naylor, Jo Hanley, Jo Lewis, Cheryl Burgess​ , 2024
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3 (CIF 3) focuses on evaluative studies which provide details of the impacts of specific interventions on equity groups in relation to access to and success in higher education.
General
Indigenous
Low SES
Regional, rural and remote
Research Reports
Feature article
Addressing placement inequities via participatory action research
A Bell​ , 2025
An ACSES Equity Fellowship final report. This project tackled placement poverty and exclusion faced by university students, especially those from equity-deserving groups, by co-developing 40 practical solutions with students and educators.
Research report
Publications
Fellowship Reports
Centring equity in data and digital governance: Informing policy to empower practice
B Stephenson​ , 2026
An ACSES Equity Fellowship final report. The project looks at how Australian universities are managing challenges around the governance of equity data, which tracks how students from underrepresented backgrounds enrol, study, and succeed in higher education.
General / all students
Research Reports
Student’s reported satisfaction at University: the role of personal characteristics and secondary school background
Ian W. Li, Denise Jackson, Paul Koshy ​ , 2024
This study addressed this topic in the Australian context using data from the annual Student Experience Survey (2016–2020 waves) with linkage to administrative records for 24,292 students from seven higher education institutions.
Equity Practitioners
Featured
Journal articles