opening page ornament

The Australian Centre for Student Equity and Success acknowledges Indigenous peoples across Australia as the Traditional Owners of the lands on which the nation’s campuses are situated. With a history spanning more than 60,000 years as the original educators, Indigenous peoples hold a unique place in our nation. We recognise the importance of their knowledge and culture, and reflect the principles of participation, equity, and cultural respect in our work. We pay our respects to Elders past, present, and future, and consider it an honour to learn from our Indigenous colleagues, partners, and friends.

Enter website
Back to Publications
You are reading: The social marketing messenger is as important as the message

Learnings from a case study of widening participation in Australian higher education

Maria Raciti and Joshua Dale (USC)

Published in AASM Viewpoint Vol. 8, No. 2
2019

Abstract

Widening participation (WP) endeavours seek to increase the participation of vulnerable students in higher education in Australia. WP has been demonstrably successful. WP outreach is predominantly people-rich, yet when faced with audience apathy and inattention, which is sometimes the case with school students, not all WP messages are able to get cut-through. This case study explores how WP messengers’ communication skills can engage students from [low socioeconomic status] backgrounds. Qualitative data were collected from 46 university students as six universities who were from low socioeconomic status backgrounds and who heralded from regional or remote locales. After analysing the data, it was found that the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion reflected why some WP messengers and not others were able to cut through audience apathy and inattention. The lessons for social marketers more broadly are to consider how your messengers’s communication skills are helping or hindering communication of your message.

The Social Marketing Messenger is as Important as the Message: Learnings from a Case Study of Widening Participation in Australian Higher Education

This article is an output from the National Priorities Pool (NPP) project Widening Regional and Remote Participation: Interrogating the Impact of Outreach Programs Across Queensland, led by the NCSEHE.

Download the full report:
ACSES Quote icon
2019-Viewpoint_-8-2_RacitiDale_22.05.19-1.pdf
2 MB
General Low SES Regional, rural and remote Journal articles
The social marketing messenger is as important as the message
M Raciti, J Dale, 2019
Featured publications
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3: Programs and approaches that enable equity in higher education
Anna Bennett, Ryan Naylor, Jo Hanley, Jo Lewis, Cheryl Burgess​ , 2024
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3 (CIF 3) focuses on evaluative studies which provide details of the impacts of specific interventions on equity groups in relation to access to and success in higher education.
General
Indigenous
The Intersection of Geography, Topography and Mindset
Susan Webb, Reshmi Lahiri-Roy, Elizabeth Knight, Paul Koshy ​ , 2024
A Nuanced Understanding of Regional, Rural and Remote Students’ Tertiary Participation in Australia.
Equity Practitioners
Regional, rural and remote
Indigenous university pathways, WIL and the strengthening of aspirations: Robbie’s journey as a learner
Garth Stahl, Sarah McDonald, Jennifer Stokes​ , 2023
A case study documenting the transition of one Indigenous student, Robbie, from an underprivileged school located in the Western suburbs of Sydney to an urban Australian university.
Indigenous
Journal articles
Equity Policy Options: Parity Targets, Final Report
ACSES​ , 2024
This report outlines policy options in relation to parity targets for four priority equity groups in Australian higher education – students from low SES backgrounds, First Nations Australian students, students with disability, and students from regional and remote Australia.
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander
Disability
More publications
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3: Programs and approaches that enable equity in higher education
Anna Bennett​ , The University of Newcastle​
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3 (CIF 3) focuses on evaluative studies which provide details of the impacts of specific interventions on equity groups in relation to access to and success in higher education.
General
Indigenous
Low SES
Regional, rural and remote
Research Reports
Feature article
The Intersection of Geography, Topography and Mindset
A Nuanced Understanding of Regional, Rural and Remote Students’ Tertiary Participation in Australia.
Equity Practitioners
Regional, rural and remote
Regional and remote
Journal articles
Indigenous university pathways, WIL and the strengthening of aspirations: Robbie’s journey as a learner
A case study documenting the transition of one Indigenous student, Robbie, from an underprivileged school located in the Western suburbs of Sydney to an urban Australian university.
Indigenous
Journal articles
Equity Policy Options: Parity Targets, Final Report
This report outlines policy options in relation to parity targets for four priority equity groups in Australian higher education – students from low SES backgrounds, First Nations Australian students, students with disability, and students from regional and remote Australia.
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander
Disability
Indigenous
Low SES
Low socioeconomic status
Regional, rural and remote
Regional and remote