The Australian Centre for Student Equity and Success acknowledges Indigenous peoples as the Traditional Owners of the lands on which our campuses are situated. With a history spanning 60,000 years as the original educators, Indigenous peoples hold a unique place in Australia. We recognise the importance of their knowledge and culture, and reflect the principles of participation, equity, and cultural respect in our work. We pay our respects to Elders past, present, and future, and consider it an honour to learn from our Indigenous colleagues, partners, and friends.

You are reading: Monitoring and Evaluation of Higher Education Equity Initiatives

Expert Summary 01/2014 by Peter Wilkins and Jennifer de Vries

PURPOSE
This summary aims to assist practitioners who are commissioning, planning or commencing evaluations of equity initiatives in higher education by identifying key issues for consideration and outlining key sources of guidance on the planning and implementing of evaluation.

BACKGROUND TO ISSUE
Australian universities are undertaking a wide range of Outreach, Access and Support initiatives to improve student equity and social inclusion within higher education. A growing need has been identified by practitioners who design and deliver equity initiatives, for improved evaluation approaches of these initiatives, to better understand what works well and why, across the sector.

KEY POINTS
Evaluation in general:

  • Evaluation requires systematic, rigorous and objective approaches to answer specific questions about how well initiatives and strategies are working. Evaluation should be considered within the planning and development phase of equity initiatives. Its audience should be clearly defined to ensure it is:
    – scoped
    – planned, and
    – reported on appropriately.
  • An essential starting point for an evaluation is clarity about the objectives of the initiative and the context in which it is being implemented.
  • Evaluations can address performance at different levels in what is often described as a performance hierarchy or results chain which includes inputs (what is needed to do this), activities (what are you doing), outputs (what is the immediate response), outcomes (have planned objectives been met) and impacts (how will this affect what people do in the future) (see Figure 1). Deciding on which aspect or aspects to be evaluated is an important consideration when designing the questions to be answered.

Read more: Expert Summary: Monitoring and Evaluation of Higher Education Equity Initiatives (105Kb)

Wilkins, P. and de Vries, J. (2014). Monitoring and Evaluation of Higher Education Equity Initiatives: Expert Summary 01/2014. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), Perth: Curtin University.
Featured publications
A case study documenting the transition of one Indigenous student, Robbie, from an underprivileged school located in the Western suburbs of Sydney to an urban Australian university.
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3 (CIF 3) focuses on evaluative studies which provide details of the impacts of specific interventions on equity groups in relation to access to and success in higher education.