The Australian Centre for Student Equity and Success acknowledges Indigenous peoples across Australia as the Traditional Owners of the lands on which the nation’s campuses are situated. With a history spanning more than 60,000 years as the original educators, Indigenous peoples hold a unique place in our nation. We recognise the importance of their knowledge and culture, and reflect the principles of participation, equity, and cultural respect in our work. We pay our respects to Elders past, present, and future, and consider it an honour to learn from our Indigenous colleagues, partners, and friends.

You are reading: Career construction, future work and the perceived risks of going to university for young people from low SES backgrounds

Research Fellowship Final Report

Maria Raciti, USC

Executive Summary

The aim of this Fellowship project was to understand the interplay between career construction in the 21st century, future work, and the perceived risks of going to university for young people from low socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. Making career decisions is becoming increasingly complex and fraught with risk. Perceived risks are endemic in the decision to go to university and this Fellowship project drilled down into the role of perceived risks in light of the contemporary career context where traditional ways of planning careers no longer work.

We live in uncertain times with the rise of the gig economy, job automation, career mini-cycles and an erosion of the sense of security that going to university will “guarantee” access to a defined, stable occupation. With more occupations to choose from than ever before, young people experience confusion or even decision paralysis. With predictions that jobs in the future are more likely to need a university education, there is a need to accelerate efforts to increase participation of people from low SES backgrounds to prevent the further deepening of social inequalities. Indeed, stemming the deepening of social inequalities was the impetus for this Fellowship project.

In brief, this project:

  • focused on the role of perceived risks in the decision to go (or not to go) to university for secondary school students from low SES backgrounds
  • outlined the decision-making processes of low SES secondary school students
  • introduced risk tolerance as a characteristic that can explain differences in how low SES secondary school students respond to the decision dilemma of whether to go (or not to go) to university.

The underpinning research question and objectives were:

  • How do the perceived risks of going to university influence the decision to participate in Australian higher education by young people from low SES backgrounds?
  • To identify the types of perceived risks that young people from low SES backgrounds associate with going to university.
  • To develop and test a model of the influence of perceived risks on the decision to go to university by young people from low SES backgrounds.

Continue reading:

Career construction, future work and the perceived risks of going to university for young people from low SES backgrounds

Fellowship Booklet

Information sheet: Ten insights for widening participation impact

Information sheet: The university participation decision making model

Information sheet: Ten types of perceived risk that influence university participation by young people from low SES backgrounds

Download the full report:
ACSES Quote icon
Report_MariaRaciti_FINAL-1.pdf
3 MB
Featured publications
The Critical Interventions Framework Part 3 (CIF 3) focuses on evaluative studies which provide details of the impacts of specific interventions on equity groups in relation to access to and success in higher education.
This report outlines policy options in relation to parity targets for four priority equity groups in Australian higher education – students from low SES backgrounds, First Nations Australian students, students with disability, and students from regional and remote Australia.
This study addressed this topic in the Australian context using data from the annual Student Experience Survey (2016–2020 waves) with linkage to administrative records for 24,292 students from seven higher education institutions.
A case study documenting the transition of one Indigenous student, Robbie, from an underprivileged school located in the Western suburbs of Sydney to an urban Australian university.
More publications