opening page ornament

The Australian Centre for Student Equity and Success acknowledges Indigenous peoples across Australia as the Traditional Owners of the lands on which the nation’s campuses are situated. With a history spanning more than 60,000 years as the original educators, Indigenous peoples hold a unique place in our nation. We recognise the importance of their knowledge and culture, and reflect the principles of participation, equity, and cultural respect in our work. We pay our respects to Elders past, present, and future, and consider it an honour to learn from our Indigenous colleagues, partners, and friends.

Enter website
Back to Publications
You are reading: Monitoring and Evaluation of Higher Education Equity Initiatives

Expert Summary 01/2014 by Peter Wilkins and Jennifer de Vries

PURPOSE
This summary aims to assist practitioners who are commissioning, planning or commencing evaluations of equity initiatives in higher education by identifying key issues for consideration and outlining key sources of guidance on the planning and implementing of evaluation.

BACKGROUND TO ISSUE
Australian universities are undertaking a wide range of Outreach, Access and Support initiatives to improve student equity and social inclusion within higher education. A growing need has been identified by practitioners who design and deliver equity initiatives, for improved evaluation approaches of these initiatives, to better understand what works well and why, across the sector.

KEY POINTS
Evaluation in general:

  • Evaluation requires systematic, rigorous and objective approaches to answer specific questions about how well initiatives and strategies are working. Evaluation should be considered within the planning and development phase of equity initiatives. Its audience should be clearly defined to ensure it is:
    – scoped
    – planned, and
    – reported on appropriately.
  • An essential starting point for an evaluation is clarity about the objectives of the initiative and the context in which it is being implemented.
  • Evaluations can address performance at different levels in what is often described as a performance hierarchy or results chain which includes inputs (what is needed to do this), activities (what are you doing), outputs (what is the immediate response), outcomes (have planned objectives been met) and impacts (how will this affect what people do in the future) (see Figure 1). Deciding on which aspect or aspects to be evaluated is an important consideration when designing the questions to be answered.

Read more: Expert Summary: Monitoring and Evaluation of Higher Education Equity Initiatives (105Kb)

Wilkins, P. and de Vries, J. (2014). Monitoring and Evaluation of Higher Education Equity Initiatives: Expert Summary 01/2014. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), Perth: Curtin University.
Download the full report:
ACSES Quote icon
Expert-Summary-Monitoring-and-Evaluation-Final.pdf
105 KB
General Publications
Download the full report
Monitoring and Evaluation of Higher Education Equity Initiatives
P Wilkins, J de Vries, 2014
Featured publications
Towards a financially inclusive higher education system
A McMahon, K Charlton, K Lambert, Y Probst, K Kent, K Walton, J Russell, K Austin, and G O’Flynn​ , 2026
A Small Grants Research Program final report. The study examined the prevalence and impact of financial hardship on university students. It evaluated the effectiveness of existing financial support services and identified barriers that prevent students from accessing essential assistance.
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander
Disability
Equity Policy Options: Parity Targets, Final Report
ACSES​ , 2024
This report outlines policy options in relation to parity targets for four priority equity groups in Australian higher education – students from low SES backgrounds, First Nations Australian students, students with disability, and students from regional and remote Australia.
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander
Disability
Indigenous success: Creating a Senior Leadership Capability Model (SLCM) through capacity building
P Anderson, T Pham, and C Tapia Parada​ , 2025
An ACSES First Nations Fellowship final report. This project created a Senior Leadership Capability Model (SLCM), which is a unique framework specifically designed for university leaders to foster Indigenous success in higher education.
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander
Indigenous
Increasing access and opportunity: Nesting enabling programs in senior schooling
A Jones, F Navin, S Dhondea-Tenakov, J Lisciandro, J Nieuwoudt, A Maclaurin, F Ramos, S Attree, and M Howie​ , 2026
A Large Grants Research Program final report. The project is the first national, cross-institutional benchmarking and impact study of in-school enabling programs in Australia, examining models and outcomes with a focus on impact for equity groups.
General / all students
Research Reports
More publications
Towards a financially inclusive higher education system
Tomasz Zając​ , The University of Queensland (UQ)​
A Small Grants Research Program final report. The study examined the prevalence and impact of financial hardship on university students. It evaluated the effectiveness of existing financial support services and identified barriers that prevent students from accessing essential assistance.
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander
Disability
General / all students
Indigenous
International
Research Reports
Equity Policy Options: Parity Targets, Final Report
This report outlines policy options in relation to parity targets for four priority equity groups in Australian higher education – students from low SES backgrounds, First Nations Australian students, students with disability, and students from regional and remote Australia.
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander
Disability
Indigenous
Low SES
Low socioeconomic status
Regional, rural and remote
Regional and remote
Indigenous success: Creating a Senior Leadership Capability Model (SLCM) through capacity building
An ACSES First Nations Fellowship final report. This project created a Senior Leadership Capability Model (SLCM), which is a unique framework specifically designed for university leaders to foster Indigenous success in higher education.
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander
Indigenous
Research report
Publications
Fellowship Reports
Increasing access and opportunity: Nesting enabling programs in senior schooling
Tomasz Zając​ , The University of Queensland (UQ)​
A Large Grants Research Program final report. The project is the first national, cross-institutional benchmarking and impact study of in-school enabling programs in Australia, examining models and outcomes with a focus on impact for equity groups.
General / all students
Research Reports